Trump's "Mu ban order" tragically lost three straight? Local 17, a federal judge ruled that Hawaii United States Derek Watson, had expected the latest version of the travel ban came into force on 18th of this month will be banned implemented. Two versions of the travel ban had launched Trump has even indirectly rebuffed in the past nine months. In many media decree opinion, this road is called "travel bans version 3.0" is still with a certain color discrimination, compared with the previous version is only a "medication", the ban faces legal challenges far from the end.

According to the US Cable News Network (CNN) reported on the 18th, Watson in a 40-page verdict, the latest version of the travel ban was approved "severely." In his view, the previous version of the existing drawbacks still exist in the "ban 3.0", one of its "flawed" that failed to fully demonstrate how immigration 6 citizens of Islamic countries would hurt US national interests. Watson noted that the new version of the ban content inconsistent, different standards, "according to the baseline established by the ban, many countries do not meet the standards, but (these countries) was not included in the ban them." He believes that the new ban with color discrimination, violation of US immigration law. American "political" news network said the US State Department confirmed that the court's decision has caused heavy losses on the "travel ban Version 3.0." The agency for six citizens of Islamic countries visa applications audit still as usual. However, some of the new ban on limiting North Korea and Venezuela, will enter into force on the 18th to normal, the judgment will not be affected.

Watson's decision quickly lead to high-level US government refuted. White House spokesman Sanderson said in a statement the same day, there is a "dangerous defect" This decision will reduce the entry of the United States safety standards. She explained that limiting the scope of the new version of the ban is based on the specific status of the national authorities unable or unwilling to share critical information, as well as official US threat assessments for these countries the results, assess covering terrorism, regime stability and other Yan Jun national security issues. The statement also said the White House believes the judiciary will eventually change attitudes, support for President "legitimate and necessary initiatives." US Justice Department spokesman Pryor responded that this decision is not only incorrect, the principle of separation of powers and not on the show due respect, may cause serious negative impact on national security, the Department of Justice will soon file an appeal .

On the other hand, there are many politicians of the ruling Watson expressed public support for refugees and civil rights organizations but this jumping for joy. Hawaii Senator Brian Schatz said: "Whether the executive branch trying to do, the judge's decision Watson already indicates that China is a country ruled by law and we welcome all migrants worldwide peace-loving people, and the fight against discrimination and xenophobia. . "new York state Attorney General Shi Shude also was pleased with the verdict, denounced the latest version of the travel ban included" unlawful purpose "exactly the same with the first two editions.

Muslim countries as the main population issued a travel ban, the current US government is one of the most controversial executive order, and this decree has been launched after repeated setbacks. In January, Trump took office only a week after the publication in the "travel ban version 1.0", Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Su Dan, Syria and Yemen 7 Islamic countries included in the restricted list, triggering widespread protests that ultimately the ban was frozen by the judiciary. In March, Trump withdraw the ban, and make adjustments, Iraq will be deleted from the list. However, the "travel ban, Version 2.0" was also halted the judiciary, the Supreme Court lawsuit has been hit. In June, "Version 2.0" adjudicated "section of the entry into force," the government Trump victory round. Last month, the "travel ban version 3.0," the official release, this version will remove Su Dan from the list of restrictions, but added Korea, Chadian citizens, as well as some officials in Venezuela and their families. Some critics say, North Korea and Venezuela on the list only "for show", because the two new countries is extremely limited impact of the new decree, a move just to make the list appear to be "not so against Muslims." CNN analysts believe the latest ruling of a federal judge Xia Weiyi has amply demonstrated the US administration and the judiciary battle is far from over, "travel ban version 3.0" of the dispute is likely to enter the Supreme Court again.